E-Science Station

CASE20240816_009

Coronary Artery Perforation: A Serious Complication of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

By Sivayos Deetes

Presenter

Sivayos Deetes

Authors

Sivayos Deetes1

Affiliation

Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Thailand1,
View Study Report
CASE20240816_009
Complication Management - Complication Management

Coronary Artery Perforation: A Serious Complication of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sivayos Deetes1

Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Thailand1,

Clinical Information

Relevant Clinical History and Physical Exam

A 67-year-old man with history of type 2 diabetes, hypertension and ischemic stroke was send from ophthalmologist due to abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) which showed normal sinus rhythm with Q wave in lead II, III, and AVF. He denied having any symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, or clinical features of heart failure. Physical examination was unremarkable.

Relevant Test Results Prior to Catheterization

A chest X-ray revealed no cardiomegaly or evidence of pulmonary congestion. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showed moderate LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF estimated 35-40%) with hypokinesia of inferior and inferoseptal wall. A Tc-99m MIBI Gated SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging was performed to evaluate coronary artery disease and showed suggestive evidence of myocardial ischemia at apex, apical anterior segments and stress-induced hypokinesia at inferior, inferoseptal wall.


Relevant Catheterization Findings

Coronary angiography (CAG) was done and showed right coronary dominance with heavily calcified vessel of left main (LM) with stenosis 70% at mid LM, calcified vessel of left anterior descending artery (LAD) with diffuse stenosis 80% at proximal to mid LAD, chronic total occlusion at proximal left circumflex artery (LCx), and heavily calcified vessel of right coronary artery (RCA) with chronic total occlusion at proximal RCA with well collateral blood supply. 


Interventional Management

Procedural Step

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was initiated by a right femoral approach using a PB 3.5 7F guide catheter placing sion black guidewire in the LAD. Rotational atherectomy was performed due to calcified vessel of LAD. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), that was used to evaluate the LAD lesion before stenting, showed diffuse fibrocalcific atherosclerotic plaque along LAD. A 3.5 mm x 28 mm everolimus-eluting stent was deployed in proximal to mid LAD and a 4.0 x 33 mm everolimus-eluting stent was deployed in LM ostium to proximal LAD, irrespectively. Post-dilatation with a 3.5 x 12 mm non-compliant balloon and a 4.5 x 15 mm non-compliant balloon was done.
Patient developed hypotension which arterial pressure was 89/68 mmHg and CAG revealed evidence of type III coronary artery perforation (Ellis classification) at distal LAD. Bedside TTE was performed and demonstrated pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology. Prompt resuscitation with bolus intravenous fluid, emergent pericardiocentesis through the subxiphoid approach using 6F pericardial sheath, and gelfoam embolization via microcatheter to treat distal LAD perforation were performed. Follow-up CAG showed no evidence of coronary artery perforation and patient's hemodynamics became stable.





Case Summary

Coronary artery perforation is a rare but serious complication of PCI that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The sudden onset of acute and sharp chest pain during balloon inflation or stent deployment should always raise the suspicion of coronary a. perforation. Prompt recognition and treatment are essential to prevent immediate life-threatening complications. Management of coronary artery perforation depends on its severity and associated hemodynamic compromise. The presence of coronary artery perforation should encourage immediate echocardiography, and when a large pericardial effusion is associated with tamponade physiology, emergent pericardiocentesis is indicated.